Before we dive into the spherically symmetric potential solution, we would like to discuss some fundamental concepts of the quantum mechanics calculus, such as operators, commutators, and expectation values.
Commutators
The commutator of two operators \(\hat{A}\) and \(\hat{B}\) is defined as:
\[[\hat{A},\hat{B}] = \hat{A}\hat{B} - \hat{B}\hat{A}\]
When operators don’t commute (\([\hat{A},\hat{B}] \neq 0\)), the corresponding observables cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision. The most famous example is position and momentum:
\[[\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar\]
This can be verified directly by applying both orderings to a test function \(\psi(x)\):
\[\hat{x}\hat{p}\psi = x\left(-i\hbar\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\right) = -i\hbar x\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\]
\[\hat{p}\hat{x}\psi = -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x\psi) = -i\hbar\left(\psi + x\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\right)\]
Subtracting these gives \([\hat{x},\hat{p}]\psi = i\hbar\psi\), confirming \([\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar\).
Generalized Uncertainty Relation
The non-commutativity of operators leads to a generalized uncertainty principle. For any two observables \(\hat{A}\) and \(\hat{B}\):
\[\Delta A \cdot \Delta B \geq \frac{1}{2}\left|\langle[\hat{A},\hat{B}]\rangle\right|\]
For position and momentum, this gives Heisenberg’s famous result:
\[\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{1}{2}|i\hbar| = \frac{\hbar}{2}\]
Compatible observables: If \([\hat{A},\hat{B}] = 0\), the operators share common eigenstates and can be measured simultaneously with arbitrary precision. Examples: \(\hat{L}^2\) and \(\hat{L}_z\), or \(\hat{H}\) and \(\hat{L}^2\) for central potentials.
Incompatible observables: If \([\hat{A},\hat{B}] \neq 0\), the observables cannot both have definite values simultaneously. Examples: \(\hat{x}\) and \(\hat{p}\), or \(\hat{L}_x\) and \(\hat{L}_z\).
Example: Harmonic Oscillator Expectation Values
As a practical application, consider the quantum harmonic oscillator in an energy eigenstate \(\psi_n(x)\). Due to the symmetry of the wavefunctions (even for even \(n\), odd for odd \(n\)), we find:
\[\langle x \rangle_n = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad \langle p \rangle_n = 0\]
These results make physical sense: on average, the oscillator is centered at the equilibrium position and has no net momentum. For the squared quantities:
\[\langle x^2 \rangle_n = \frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \quad \text{and} \quad \langle p^2 \rangle_n = m\omega\hbar\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)\]
The uncertainties are therefore:
\[\Delta x_n = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)} \quad \text{and} \quad \Delta p_n = \sqrt{m\omega\hbar\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)}\]
The uncertainty product is:
\[\Delta x_n \cdot \Delta p_n = \hbar\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\]
Remarkably, the ground state (\(n=0\)) is a minimum uncertainty state, saturating the Heisenberg inequality with \(\Delta x_0 \cdot \Delta p_0 = \hbar/2\).
The expectation value of the energy demonstrates the quantum mechanical virial theorem:
\[\langle T \rangle_n = \frac{\langle p^2 \rangle_n}{2m} = \frac{\hbar\omega}{2}\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) = \frac{E_n}{2}\]
\[\langle V \rangle_n = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\langle x^2 \rangle_n = \frac{\hbar\omega}{2}\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) = \frac{E_n}{2}\]
For the harmonic oscillator, the average kinetic and potential energies are equal, each contributing half of the total energy.
Example: Angular Momentum Operator
The angular momentum plays a key role in such spherically symmetric systems, as it is a conserved quantity due to the rotational symmetry of the potential. We will therefore discuss the angular momentum operator in more detail. The angular momentum operator is defined as the cross product of the position and momentum operators:
\[\vec{\hat{L}} = \vec{r} \times \vec{\hat{p}}\]
This relationship makes sense intuitively since classically, angular momentum is defined as \(\vec{L} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}\). The quantum mechanical momentum is given by:
\[\vec{\hat{p}} = -i\hbar\nabla\]
When we calculate the cross product explicitly, we obtain the expressions for the components of the angular momentum that we’ll use extensively in solving the spherically symmetric potential:
\[
\begin{aligned}
\hat{L}_x &= -i\hbar\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) \\
\hat{L}_y &= -i\hbar\left(z\frac{\partial}{\partial x} - x\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right) \\
\hat{L}_z &= -i\hbar\left(x\frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)
\end{aligned}
\]
The angular momentum squared operator \(\hat{L}^2\) is defined as: \[
\hat{L}^2 = \hat{L}_x^2 + \hat{L}_y^2 + \hat{L}_z^2
\]
and we can write down the square of the angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates:
\[
\hat{L}^2 = -\hbar^2\left[\frac{1}{\sin \left( \vartheta \right)} \frac{\partial}{\partial \vartheta}
\left( \sin \left( \vartheta \right) \frac{\partial}{\partial \vartheta} \right) +
\frac{1}{\sin^2 \left( \vartheta \right)} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \varphi^2}\right]
\]
Note that the coordinate transformation from Cartesian to spherical coordinates is necessary to obtain the angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates.
\[
\begin{aligned}
x & = r \sin \left( \vartheta \right) \cos \left( \varphi \right)\\
y & = r \sin \left( \vartheta \right) \sin \left( \varphi \right)\\
z & = r \cos \left( \vartheta \right) \mathrm{.}
\end{aligned}
\]
and the reverse transformation is given by
\[
\begin{aligned}
r & = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}\\
\vartheta & = \arccos \left( \frac{z}{r} \right)\\
\varphi & = \arctan \left( \frac{y}{x} \right) \mathrm{.}
\end{aligned}
\]
The eigenfunctions of the angular momentum operator are the spherical harmonics \(Y_l^m \left( \vartheta, \varphi \right)\), which we will discuss in more detail later. The quantum number \(l\) denotes the magnitude of the angular momentum, while \(m\) is the projection of the angular momentum along the \(z\)-axis.
The eigenvalues of the angular momentum squared operator \(\hat{L}^2\) are given by
\[
\hat{L}^2 Y_l^m \left( \vartheta, \varphi \right) = \hbar^2 l \left( l+1 \right) Y_l^m \left( \vartheta, \varphi \right)
\]
such that the magnitude of the angular momentum is quantized in units of \(\hbar\), i.e.
\[
\left| \vec{\hat{L}} \right| = \sqrt{l \left( l+1 \right)} \hbar
\]
so that we know precisely the magnitude of the angular momentum.
The projection of the angular momentum along the \(z\)-axis is quantized in units of \(\hbar\) as well, i.e.
\[
\hat{L}_z Y_l^m \left( \vartheta, \varphi \right) = \hbar m Y_l^m \left( \vartheta, \varphi \right)
\]
where \(m\) can take on values from \(-l\) to \(l\) in integer steps. Thus both the magnitude and the projection of the angular momentum are quantized in units of \(\hbar\) and can be measured precisely. Yet, the components of the angular momentum along the \(x\)- and \(y\)-axis are not precisely known, since the angular momentum is quantized along the \(z\)-axis.
Both the \(\hat{L}_x\) and the \(\hat{L}_y\) operators do not commute with the \(\hat{L}_z\) operator, i.e.
\[[\hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_z] = \hat{L}_x \hat{L}_z - \hat{L}_z \hat{L}_x\]
Using the expressions for \(\hat{L}_x\) and \(\hat{L}_z\):
\[\hat{L}_x = -i\hbar\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right)\]
\[\hat{L}_z = -i\hbar\left(x\frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)\]
First computing \(\hat{L}_x \hat{L}_z\): \[\hat{L}_x \hat{L}_z = (-i\hbar)^2\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right)\left(x\frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)\]
And \(\hat{L}_z \hat{L}_x\):
\[\hat{L}_z \hat{L}_x = (-i\hbar)^2\left(x\frac{\partial}{\partial y} - y\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial z} - z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right)\]
Subtracting and collecting terms leads to
\[[\hat{L}_x,\hat{L}_z] = i\hbar(-i\hbar)\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial x} - x\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) = i\hbar \hat{L}_y\]
which directly shows that the \(\hat{L}_x\) and \(\hat{L}_z\) operators do not commute. The same is also true for the other components of the angular momentum.
\[
\left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_z \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_y
\]
\[
\left[ \hat{L}_y, \hat{L}_z \right] = -i\hbar \hat{L}_x
\]
\[
\left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_z
\]
This non-commutativity of the angular momentum components arises fundamentally from the algebra of the angular momentum operators; it reflects the fact that only one component (typically the \(z\)-component) can be determined precisely at a time. While \(\hat{L}_z\) is quantized and its value is well defined, the \(x\) and \(y\) components remain uncertain. Specifically, the relation
\[
\hat{L}^2-\hat{L}_z^2 = \hat{L}_x^2 + \hat{L}_y^2 = \hbar^2 \left(l(l+1)-m^2\right)
\]
represents the magnitude of the angular momentum projected onto the \(xy\)-plane. This formulation is correct and will be crucial later when using the angular momentum operator to solve the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom. In that context, the quantum numbers \(l\) and \(m\) play a key role in determining the energy levels and wavefunctions.
| 0 |
0 |
s |
1 |
| 1 |
-1…+1 |
p |
3 |
| 2 |
-2…+2 |
d |
5 |
| 3 |
-3…+3 |
f |
7 |
| 4 |
-4…+4 |
g |
9 |
| 5 |
-5…+5 |
h |
11 |
The names come from historical spectroscopic notation: sharp (s), principal (p), diffuse (d), and fundamental (f). After f, the letters continue alphabetically.